Non Euclidean Geometry, part II

[celamity]

The media that reported that the aurora would vanish from here within 50 years (oh noes!) have now been pointed towards more reputable sources, which amongst other things, explained that the pole on the surface is not the exact pole itself, and that the diameter of the aurora oval around the pole changes size and shape according to other factors as well.

Thus, the media have retracted their original story. (Apparently, the tourist industry up here is now allowed to breathe a sigh of relief.)

I, for one, feel vindicated in my original belief that there was something fishy and oversimplistic about the story as first presented :)

Comments

[kendokamel.livejournal.com]

Yeah, something seemed odd about that story when I first read it.

[celamity.livejournal.com]

Its appearance (and the exaggerated implications for the aurora patterns) in Norwegian media were thanks to a well-known astronomer (not a researcher, mor like an astronomy PR guy) whom, if I am to be polite, can only be described as over-enthusiastic. Every celestial event these days gets a comment from him, always saying this is awesome, incredible, and will never happen again!

Needless to say, I consider everything he says with deep mistrust and weariness.